Painful total knee arthroplasty: Infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve selective denervation. A case series.

INTRODUCTION: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a reliable and widespread solution for knee osteoarthritis treatment, but about 20% of the patients complains of persisting pain. Neuroma formation in the IPBSN (infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve) is an undervalued cause of persistent anterior pain after TKA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the selective neuroma denervation on patients satisfaction and pain improvement. MATHERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2014 and 2020, we evaluated 13 patients suffering from persistent anterior knee pain and numbness after TKA who underwent a surgical neurectomy of the IPBSN. After clinical assessment and diagnosis confirmation, we carried out the surgery. Short Form 12 Health (SF12), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) have been collected before and after the procedure. After the surgical treatment, the symptom's resolution and patients' satisfaction were attested by the achievement of the Minimal ClinicallyImportantDifference(MCID) of the self-administered patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). RESULTS: Our results showed a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05) of patients pain perception (mean NRS improvement -4.2, SD 2.5) and overall satisfaction (with a mean increase in OKS of 14.5 points SD 9.4, and in SF12 of 6.5 points SD 4.0). CONCLUSIONS: Hence, our study suggests that selective neuroma denervation may be an effective solution to improve the quality of life of patients who develop this complication after TKA.

[Appropriateness of the request for preoperative cardiological evaluation in non-cardiac surgery: 8-year experience in a high-volume cardiological center]. / Appropriatezza della richiesta di consulenza cardiologica preoperatoria nella chirurgia non cardiaca: esperienza di 8 anni di un centro cardiologico ad alto volume di attività.

BACKGROUND: In the last decades the population undergoing non-cardiac surgery has become more numerous and complex. Cardiovascular perioperative complications represent at least one third of the perioperative deaths. Despite the pivotal role of the cardiologist in the perioperative management, current guidelines are often hardly useful in different settings of clinical practice. Local clinical protocols contribute to fill these gaps, to define the role of each specialist in the perioperative context and to achieve the best medical outcome. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study analyzes the background of 33 463 preoperatory cardiologic visits, the adherence to scientific evidence in our institute and the impact of the implementation of a shared clinical protocol (CP) in terms of reduction of inappropriate requests of cardiological evaluations. RESULTS: Among all the patients, the mean age was 59 ± 18 years, 52.8% were male. Hypertension was the most prevalent disease followed by diabetes, chronic coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation. The "low-risk surgery" category was the most represented (56.2%) and the vast majority of patients (70.1%) was totally free from predictors of perioperative cardiovascular events. After the introduction of the CP, the number of inappropriate evaluations decreased by 32%, mainly in the low-risk category. However, despite the overall reduction, almost two thirds of the evaluations were still deemed inappropriate according to the CP, mostly (82.9%) in the low-risk category and to a lesser degree (55%) in the moderate/high-risk category. CONCLUSIONS: The inappropriate use of the resources resulted in disappointing organizational performance, poor assistance quality and a huge number of inappropriate preoperatory evaluations. The implementation of a CP, developed on the basis of the local needs, is a useful tool to enhance the organizational standards for the cardiological evaluation of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Regular verifications, a widespread knowledge of the guidelines and a more efficient system of management and surveillance may improve the appropriateness of these evaluations.

Preoperative assessment of cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: the Orion study.

In patients undergoing noncardiac surgery risk indices can estimate patients' perioperative risk of major cardiovascular complications. The indexes currently in use were derived from observational studies that are now outdated with respect to the current clinical context. We undertook a prospective, observational, cohort study to derive, validate, and compare a new risk index with established risk indices. We evaluated 7335 patients (mean age 63±13 years) who underwent noncardiac surgery. Based on prospective data analysis of 4600 patients (derivation cohort) we developed an Updated Cardiac Risk Score (UCRS), and validated the risk score on 2735 patients (validation cohort). Four variables (i.e. the UCRS) were significantly associated with the risk of a major perioperative cardiovascular events: high-risk surgery, preoperative estimate glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73 m2, age ≥75 years, and history of heart failure. Based on the UCRS we created risk classes 1,2,3 and 4 and their corresponding 30-day risk of a major cardiovascular complication was 0.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5-1.7], 2.5 (95% CI 1.6-5.6), 8.7 (95% CI 5.2-18.9) and 27.2 (95% CI 11.8-50.3), respectively. No significant differences were found between the derivation and validation cohorts. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrate a high predictive performance of the new index, with greater power to discriminate between the various classes of risk than the indexes currently used. The high predictive performance and simplicity of the UCRS make it suitable for wide-scale use in preoperative cardiac risk assessment of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.